God is Not an Antisemite (Pt. 2)

“…so is my word that goes out from my mouth; it will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it.” (Isaiah 55:11 NIV)

For over 470 years, Calvin’s “Institutes” has served as a textbook for students of Systematic Theology. It has guided a major branch of Protestantism on God’s Sovereignty, Christ’s salvation, and a host of other doctrinal points. It might be surprising that a minute fraction of “Institutes” is dedicated to the subject of God’s sovereignty in prophecy Revelation (cf. 11:15-18).

My answer as to why prophecy was nearly irrelevant to Calvin, Luther, Knox and other great Christian Reformers, is this: Their teaching had another purpose. The Spirit veiled their minds. Only now, in the latter days, are the prophets’ words being unsealed. Those receiving insight today are motivated by the same Spirit that stirred Daniel to read Jeremiah (cf. Dan. 9:1-3). Those who have an ear to hear what the Spirit is saying have focused their attention on Christ’s repeated admonition, “I am coming soon!” (Rev. 22:7, 12, 20)

So shall the Lord’s word be that came from his mouth. He is coming soon! Tragically, multiplied millions of Christians following the instruction of the Great Reformers and their disciples, do not believe what Jesus has said. Teachers who are steeped in Calvinism have erased the plain meaning of foretold events by rejecting a literal interpretation of Scripture and injecting symbolism. They refuse to examine prophecy in its context or compare a passage with all other relevant passages. This highly intellectual, academically-trained multitude forgo accuracy by ignoring the near/far prophetic in Scripture. One could say they have thrown out the major rules for Bible interpretation to promote their theology.

Beginning with the 4th century and St. Augustine, Christians began to fall in love with human reasoning, intellect and thoughts. With all his brilliance, Augustine had also developed an antisemitic theology. (I have written of this at length in Key 22 of “The People of God”.)

“Amillennialism”, the widely-held view that the Millennium, Christ’s thousand-year reign (Rev. 20:4-6, Acts 1:6), is not a literal future event, came about by Augustine’s influence. Christ’s coming was to be understood only in spiritual terms. As a result, the Catholics and mainline Protestants Augustine influenced have embraced an “allegorical” (a good vs. evil tale) view of Revelation and prophecy.

Augustine’s anti-Jew sentiments gave birth to “Replacement Theology”. As far as God’s promises to Jacob’s offspring are concerned, the inheritance now belongs to Gentile Christians.

Catholics and Protestants have been guilty of terrible atrocities against the House of Judah. This is attributable to their Satanically-inspired belief that God has forever cursed the Jew. Within a segment of Presbyterianism, a virile strain of hatred for Israel exists. Their god is indeed antisemitic.

Lord, deliver your people from this and other lies. Open the ears and eyes of your true saints before it is too late. As you did with Simon, rebuke these misguided teachers. They do not utter the Father’s thoughts nor do they express his heart. Instead, they exalt the ideas of men (Matt. 16:23).

2 Replies to “God is Not an Antisemite (Pt. 2)

  1. This is a well done post. You explained what amillennialism is clearly. God sealed prophecy for a while until the time of the end. The apostles believed in a literal Kingdom ruled by Jesus (see Acts 1). However, it was not for them to know the times that the Father would establish this. Their job was to preach the Gospel from Jerusalem outward.

    St. Augustine tried to calculate when the physical reign of Christ would occur. He never could (because it was not meant for him to)and thus Augustine theorized that this reign of Jesus was spiritual in nature. When the Roman Catholic church supported this belief, she made a grave error in hypocrisy. Catholicism is based on Apostolic tradition first and sacred scripture second. However, apostolic tradition states that there will be a literal kingdom restored to Israel. The early church fathers of the 1st and 2nd centuries believed this as well.

    Finally, Isaiah himself speaks against those who support amillennialism. Most denominations that support this idea will agree that the prophesies spoken in Isaiah concerning the Messiah’s birth (chapters 7 and 9) and his crucifixion (chapter 53) were literally fulfilled in the Gospels with Jesus’ birth and crucifixion. So when these groups then spiritualize Isaiah 65, there is a major problem because those churches have become GOD in that they are saying which prophesies to believe and what ones to not take literally. Either accept all of Isaiah’s prophecies or none of them!

    If all of Isaiah’s prophecies are to be believed, then this is what we know from chapter 65. There will come a future time where peace will reign on earth without weapons. Animals will live at ease with one another and life spans will be expanded. Men will live on their own lands in good health. Yet the sin nature and death still exist. So this is not eternity.

  2. So what you have brilliantly illustrated is the hypocrisy among amillennialists. They proclaim absolute submission to the Word of God. (“Thus saith the Lord!”) In regard to Christ’s first coming, they cite the prophecies of Isaiah, Micah and Zechariah with authority. Then, these same leaders do this: Instead of using these same prophets to prepare God’s people for Jesus’ soon return, they teach their flock to interpret end time prophecy spiritually. The moment they universally apply the standard of literal interpretation to foretold events, their replacement theology is destroyed and the Jew is again front and center in salvation’s plan (John 4:22). Literalness represents the same threat to the Amillennialists prosperity and position as Christ’s Messiahship did to the Pharisees. Herein is why those who embrace Amillennialism have open hostility to God’s chosen people. One might conclude they have entered into an unholy alliance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *